Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 641 - 660
of 76,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2024, 4:47 am
“Relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 is not lightly given, and requires a showing of egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Kaufman v Moritt Hock & Hamroff, LLP, 192 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2021] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Pa.) and Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:22 pm
Granfinanciera, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 1:28 pm
The trial court thought that fees weren't warranted because the litigation did not, in fact, change anything; the District abandoned the "Roadmap" for reasons unrelated to the litigation, given the changing dynamics of the epidemic. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:55 am
The UPC seems keen to give the description more weight than it is usually given by the EPO Boards of Appeal (IPKat). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:49 am
Whiteside v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:28 am
Ward v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:11 am
SCCChokehold danger is for trial judges, not appeal courtsR. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:00 am
David V. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:48 am
Courts evaluate various factors to ensure the child’s well-being, as outlined in the landmark case Holley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Ortovox v Mammut The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Sheetz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm
The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm
Given the continuing discussion about the Supreme Court’s decision to overrule Chevron in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
Lans v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am
Given Mapp and Teague, from my vantage point, the issue of whether Morrison v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:40 am
”] From yesterday's decision by Judge Frank Whitney (W.D.N.C.) in McBride v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:51 am
However, where disqualification is not required under objective standards, a judge ‘is the sole arbiter of recusal’ (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]). [read post]
