Search for: "Grant v. Thomas" Results 641 - 660 of 5,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
The granted issues in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Supreme Court 2011) The patent act indicates that issued patents are "presumed valid. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am by CMS
Alaina Wadsworth, Ben Brown, Ed Foss and Thomas Pangbourne, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 30 October 2019, in the matter of Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ [2019] UKSC 48:  In a decision arising out of claims relating to defective silicone breast implants, the Supreme Court has provided guidance on insurers’ potential liability for third-party costs orders. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:16 pm
Oct 22 2008 Application (08A358) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 4, 2008. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:58 am by James Bickford
Millender, in which the Court recently granted certiorari. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Phil Cave
  We granted certiorari, 564 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am by Nabiha Syed
The Court granted certiorari in one new case, Bailey v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch join, dissenting from grant of application for stay. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
App. ___, 815 S.E.2d 415, 421 (2018) (internal quotations omitted) (PDR granted); see also Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am by Gene Quinn
The majority opinion was authored by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court cited the case of Nixon v US, which involved impeachment but not of president Nixon. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
While it has been held that, in extreme circumstances, simply the publication of material (for example in a newspaper) can constitute harassment (see for example Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2001] EWCA Civ 1233) it seems unlikely that the court would consider that the publication of any material identifying Mrs Kerner or her son would be harassment and must itself be restrained. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
After hearing the testimony of both parties' experts, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Thomas Phelan granted plaintiff's motion to exclude the computer fire modeling testimony: The NFPA Users Manual for 921 states: "To conduct valid modeling and testing it is important that the investigator gather data that is as accurate and complete as possible. [read post]