Search for: "HOBBS V. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Hobbs (10-9647); the Court granted review of the two separately, but said that it will hear oral arguments in them back-to-back. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:07 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) – On November 13, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Hobbs Act (also known as the Administrative Orders Review Act) requires the district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretation of the TCPA, in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Hobbs (2014): Unanimous victory for the Muslim claimant. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Hendrick v Tony Knight (O-323-14) is a decision of Appointed Person Geoffrey Hobbs QC, involving the sadly-known Tony Knight. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Hobbs (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9647 Issue(s): Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:02 am
., writes: In United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
United States, 62 Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
United States the court held that a state legislator could not be convicted of Hobbs Act extortion merely for taking actions that benefited a group that had contributed to his re-election. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
They contended that the state court’s decision is inconsistent with Caldwell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Frazier v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am
U.S. and Hill v. [read post]