Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 3:30 am
The judgment The leading judgment at the Supreme Court was given jointly by Lady Hale and Lord Toulson. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
Fortunately, and clearly correctly, the Supreme Court answers the question posed in paragraph 1 of the judgment of Lady Hale and Lord Toulson as to whether Wilkinson v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
Lady Hale, applying a common sense approach to the issue, held that: ‘The question is whether the reasons for the failure to offer a new contract relate to the individual or to the needs of the business. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
Also, Baroness Hale’s analysis sits in sharp contrast to the approach that Mr Justice Eady would later take in Mosley where he was less convinced that the commission of any crime is always a matter of public interest meriting publication (Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [117]). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale (with whom Lord Hodge and Lord Kerr agreed). [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke dismissed National Grid’s appeal against this ruling. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:52 am
I had been following this case--Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
The entire panel agreed, however, that summary judgment was properly granted on her public policy wrongful discharge claim since she failed to show that a state regulation setting forth baseline recordkeeping requirements for pharmacies mirrored the state whistleblower law or that she ever reported a violation (Hale v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Handing down a unanimous judgment, Lord Thomas and Lady Hale concurring for narrower reasons, Lord Mance (with whom Lord Neuberger and Lord Hodge agreed) held that the Bill was outside the legislative competence of the Welsh Assembly under both section 198(4) and 108(5) of the Government of Wales Act 2006 and was incompatible with the ECHR, A1P1. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 1:55 am
Lord Reed at [74] – [75] with Lady Hale at [182] and [206]). [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
Yesterday, we posted the immigration law law professors amici curiae brief in Texas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson on 18 and 19 March 2015. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:51 pm
Supreme Court's decision in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:57 pm
Lady Hale accepts the validity of these criticisms and finds (para.36) that WCC gave no serious consideration to its obligations in Ms N’s case. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
R(N) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 799 (Admin) (26 February 2015) [Not on Bailii, we’ve seen a transcript.] [read post]
