Search for: "Hill v. Day" Results 641 - 660 of 2,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill, John Bursch weighs in on the pending cert petition in First Amendment mootness case Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am by Kalvis Golde
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Aaron Tang suggests that there is an issue lurking in Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:47 am by Kalvis Golde
At Law360 (registration required), Daniel Dalton argues that, should the justices decide Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At The Hill, Kaelan Deese reports that Jack Phillips, owner of the cakeshop at the center of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:39 am by Kalvis Golde
At The Atlantic, Richard Hasen remembers the decision in Bush v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Richard Seeborg, held hearings with four days of viva voce testimony from four of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses (two on biological plausibility, and two on epidemiology), and three of the defense’s experts. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 21, 10:00 a.m.: The Brookings Institution will hold a book event for “Unmaking the Presidency” by Lawfare’s Susan Hennessey and Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, Jan. 14, 10:00 a.m.: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing onthe administration's Iran policy. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am by Eugene Volokh
He then intervened to unseal the case, and Monday Tax Court Judge Patrick DeAlmeida agreed (Hill v. [read post]