Search for: "Imperial v. Imperial" Results 641 - 660 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2012, 10:00 am by cjschlos
  Back in 1917, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote that musical performances in restaurants are not “eleemosynary” but rather, “are part of a total for which the public pays” Herbert v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 4:51 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
A Gap, a Map, and an Intellectual Trap: Changing Conceptions of Regime Interaction and of Interdisciplinarity Jeffrey L Dunoff PART V: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES 14. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm by Gideon Alper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a series of orders and opinions in the Perry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:46 am by Ron Coleman
 And it’s a good thing for Simon Tam that the Supreme Court isn’t the Seventh Circuit after its astonishing en banc decision in Hively v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 12:19 pm by Ron Coleman
 And it’s a good thing for Simon Tam that the Supreme Court isn’t the Seventh Circuit after its astonishing en banc decision in Hively v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm by Joel Welch
So when Star Wars Celebration V (“SWCV”) was announced for Orlando, August 12 – 15, 2010, I thought it may be an opportunity to do some legal blogging among one of popular culture’s leading franchises. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Greg Ablavsky
Hoffer, University of GeorgiaSaturday, July 219:00-10:45: Land, Labor, and War: The Emergence of America’s Central State, 1780-1840(pre-circulated paper available at conference website)PRESIDING: Harry Watson, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Land, Labor, and War: The Emergence of America’s Central State, 1780-1840 Gary Gerstle, Vanderbilt University COMMENT: Elizabeth Blackmar, Columbia UniversityAdam Rothman, Georgetown… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
No dia 18 de novembro, D.Pedro II e a família imperial partiam rumo à Europa. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm by Nikki Siesel
In the end, the Board held that the term ROMANOV was a rare surname, not associated with the Applicant and that the purchasing public would perceive the mark as identifying the imperial ruling dynasty of Russia, not an individual with that surname. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:39 am by Theo Francis
So is his claim mere braggadocio from a once imperial CEO? [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
No dia 18 de novembro, D.Pedro II e a família imperial partiam rumo à Europa. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:23 pm by russell
No te o un miembro de su familia sea víctima de la guerra fronteriza México-Estados Unidos. [read post]