Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 641 - 660
of 29,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2009, 12:21 am
For various legal scholarship attempting to calculate better sized patent terms, see Mark A. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 8:07 am
The post Harassment Restraining Orders and Res Judicata appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:16 pm
If he could come back from the dead and defend Mark Lambert, we're sure he'd come up with a catchy slogan. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
" In re On the way LLC, Serial No. 87037256 (June 10, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas].Click on picture for larger imageAn acceptable specimen must show “some direct association between the offer of services and the mark sought to be registered therefor. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Not clear we have a right answer in © but at least we’re thinking about it. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 11:10 am
I.e., are pre-2007 cases that were deemed not citable, now citable "for what they're worth"? [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:03 am
In re Southeastern Dermatology, PA, Serial No. 86187997 (July 15, 2015) [not precedential].The Board found this appeal to be barred by claim preclusion, sometimes referred to by people of a certain age as res judicata. [read post]
20 May 2007, 5:48 pm
In re Dioptics Medical Prods., Inc., Serial No. 78453049 (May 4, 2007) [not precedential].Applicant Dioptics started off behind the proverbial 8-ball, because when identical goods are involved, a lesser degree of similarity in the marks is required to support a determination of likely confusion. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:39 am
In re VOX Media Inc., Serial No. 85085395 (February 19, 2013) [not precedential].Applicant argued that the letters "MMA" represent the following:The white portion of the letter "A" is clearly a thumb with the thumbnail showing. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:46 am
In re CirCaid Medical Products, Serial No. 85401718 (February 5, 2013) [not precedential].Examining Attorney Dominic R. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
You’re right baby. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:55 am
In re Pa+hfinder, LLC, Application Serial No. 90338230 (April 11, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 12:38 pm
”); In re Coors Brewing Co., 343 F.3d 1340, 1345 (Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:14 pm
In re Loral Space and Communications is consistent with this antipathy. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:28 am
Mark Begich to step down from the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 3:02 pm
See In re Chica, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848-49 (TTAB 2007) [precedential]; See also In re Apparel Ventures, Inc. 229 USPQ 225 (TTAB 1986). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm
And especially, if the governmental authorities, like the police try to use their might to acquite land using this doctrine, it is the most tragic – in the Supreme Court’s words – “a testament to the absurdity of the law and a black mark upon the justice system’s legitimacy“. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 10:43 am
Here is the opinion in In re Tam: In re Tam An excerpt: Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act bars the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) from registering scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 5:09 am
In re Sports Outdoor And Recreation (SOAR) Park, Serial Nos. 85108918 and 85108928 (February 10, 2014) [not precedential].Click on picture for larger imageThe examining attorney argued that the marks do not appear as source indicators for theme park services. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
In re Cook Medical Technologies LLC, 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1377 (TTAB 2012) [precedential], involving teal and blue medical devices, the Board stated in dictum that Section 18 is available to restrict the color in a registered mark. [read post]
