Search for: "In re Robert B." Results 641 - 660 of 2,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
"Â Pretty bad when a beating is Plan B in the parental handbook. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:13 am by Larry Ribstein
We’re engineers, not theoretical physicists. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Chopper Distinguished Professor of Law, UC Berkeley Law SchoolModerator: Vera Bergelson, Distinguished Professor of Law and Robert E. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:17 am by Guest Blogger
”  This point, he goes on to contend (asserting en route that the point was “conceded” in briefs filed by the Justice Department and by the Constitutional Accountability Center), shows that “anyone who claims that the Senate never considered withholding subsidies in recalcitrant states is either a) dishonest, or b) doesn’t know what they’re talking about. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:03 pm by law shucks
Ahh, the good old “they’re big and we’re small so we shouldn’t have to pay defense! [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:54 am by Sonya Hubbard
There is one other clue – a press release published January 4 – that includes a rather standard statement from Blyth’s Chairman of the Board and CEO, Robert Goergen, saying that he “support[s] [Butler's] desire to transition to additional entrepreneurial activities and the next phase of her life.” Goergen’s son, Robert B. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am by Ronald Mann
” Chief Justice John Roberts was preoccupied with what would happen under Geyser’s position if “one district decides they’re going to buy computers from computer company A and another says no, we’re going to buy them from B. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 3:44 pm by Phil Cameron
B: As you're probably aware, there's been a revolution in IT [information technology], robotics, nanotechnology, and in bio-inspired design. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Kent Piacenti for re-upping to do a few more installments. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:28 pm
Slip op. at 50.The racketeering allegations - predicated on alleged fraud - are not pleaded with the specificity required under Rule 9(b). [read post]