Search for: "Jonathan"
Results 641 - 660
of 25,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell rejected the notion that the violent assault on the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
“Professor Baude and Professor Paulson criticized Griffin’s Case very sharply,” says Jonathan Mitchell, the lawyer arguing for Trump and making the point that the case was in tension with the ability of Congress to lift any disqualification by a two-thirds vote. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
When Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell was questioned, none of the justices asked about whether Trump’s actions constituted an insurrection until Jackson raised it in her final question. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Here, Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell made some striking concessions. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:14 pm
Representing the former president, lawyer Jonathan Mitchell told the justices that states cannot use Section 3 to bar Trump from running for office – that is, to exclude him from the ballot – because Section 3 also leaves open the possibility that Congress could, by a two-thirds vote, lift the ban that Section 3 would otherwise impose after Trump is elected but before he actually takes office. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Jonathan Mitchell pushed back against that argument, fearful of what it would mean for the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:33 am
This is a question to the blog clinic from Jonathan (not his real name), who is a landlord in England. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
You will be hearing arguments from: Jonathan Mitchell, who is representing Trump. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:47 pm
Jonathan Cervas, Bernie Grofman, Scott Matsuda, and Justine Kawa have posted this draft on SSRN. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 12:58 pm
Navarro, Jonathan P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[The case raises an issue of high importance and the opinion may contain some loose reasoning.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:17 am
’ More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:50 am
” Jonathan Swift. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:52 pm
Constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley said impeachment is not to be used for being “a bad Cabinet member. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:04 am
I would like to thank Sarah and Jonathan for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:25 am
The SPC reform which is currently undergoing the legislative procedure in the European Union has taken a further decisive step forward, as the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI Committee) has approved an amended version of the draft text of the four new EU regulations on SPCs for medicinal and plant protection products as well as corresponding unitary SPCs. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on Patenting AI-Related Inventions by Jonathan P. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
[The Justice Department is wasting no time seeking to put this zombie litigation out of its misery, and the plaintiffs are not happy about it.] [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:45 am
Lawyers, like those at the Law Offices of Jonathan Steele, are trained in this crucial skill. [read post]
