Search for: "Leone v. Leone" Results 641 - 660 of 1,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2013, 11:29 am by Dan Ernst
Des Moines Independent Community School District, Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff's affidavit, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted "with intent to deceive the court or any party" (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
Those documents “conclusively establish[] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court erred in determining that Leone's waiver of her interest in the retirement plan death benefit was not "explicit, voluntary and made in good faith" ( Silber v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint, as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit, as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome on his workers’ compensation claim (see Katsoris… [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Upon construing the complaint liberally, and affording plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we reject defendants’ contention that the breach of contract cause of action is duplicative of the accounting malpractice cause of action. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"Accepting the facts alleged in the second amended complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the second amended complaint states a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Aranki v Goldman & Assoc., LLP, 34 AD3d 510). [read post]