Search for: "Lowers v. Lowers (Complete Opinion)"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Reproductive rights advocates and activists breathed a collectively sigh of relief when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:03 am
Justice Sotomayor’s opinion, in Liu v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:17 pm
David TopolIn its June 2017 decision in Kokesh v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court's decision remanded the case to lower courts. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
" Christopher v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[xvi] As of 2018, only 5% of completed deals were challenged in Delaware Chancery Court, while 92% were challenged in federal court. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
A complete analysis of this opinion related California’s win in a partial summary judgment over California-Quebec&rs [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
This is true whether the step completely changes a reliable methodology or merely misapplies that methodology. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:00 am
Davis Construction Corporation v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Unlike lower courts, which must hear whatever cases are brought within their jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has nearly complete discretion over its docket, allowing it to choose those concrete cases that have significance beyond the particular parties.Moreover, the parties whose cases give rise to important rules of law can be unsavory characters. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Ray], we have ‘completely reformulated qualified immunity along principles not at all embodied in the common law. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:45 pm
The respondent's attack against inventive step made for the first time with its response to the grounds of appeal, starting from D3 and combining this with the general knowledge of a skilled person was also indicated as likely to be held inadmissible under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007.V. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
” To name a few: The report recommends ensuring the independence and professional protection of the “540F judge advocate” while sustaining the ability of the current convening authority to submit a statement outlining his or her considered opinion about how the crime and its prosecution affects discipline, efficiency, and morale; the report highlights the need for an independent “court administrative office,” like the U.K. uses, to manage arranging for the… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
Furthermore, the litany of remedies for “shaky but admissible evidence” fails to help lower court judges and lawyers sort shaky but admissible evidence from shaky and inadmissible evidence. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
