Search for: "MATTER OF D L T" Results 641 - 660 of 3,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Binette, 2021 QCCA 1663 [28] En Cour supérieure, le juge a conclu que depuis l’arrêt Vavilov, il n’y a plus de déférence dans l’examen des décisions des tribunaux administratifs spécialisés lorsque le législateur a prévu un appel. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Div. of Occupational & Prof’l Licensing of Dep’t of Commerce, 240 F.3d 871, 875 (10th Cir. 2001) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the court really wants to keep the plaintiff's identity secret, then the witness would have to be put under some sort of protective order to remain quiet about that identity as well.[8] Many people are likely to resist becoming witnesses if that means agreeing to a protective order, at least if they have no personal stake in the matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Lozano, 2021 QCCDPHA 39 [52] Toutefois, hormis l’expression de certains principes généraux, dont ceux énoncés à l’alinéa 1 de l’article 23 C. prof., selon lequel « Chaque ordre a pour principale fonction d’assurer la protection du public » et ceux prévus à l’article 156 C. prof., le Code des professions est silencieux sur les critères à… [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
.'"[9] And other courts put it even more strongly: [L]awsuits are public events and the public has a legitimate interest in knowing the facts involved in them. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  But if you are then asked to stay in the same spot and read line 4, that’s a cinch because the font size of those letters is a little bit bigger:  L P E D. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  But if you are then asked to stay in the same spot and read line 4, that’s a cinch because the font size of those letters is a little bit bigger:  L P E D. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Courts have observed this and often cite this as a reason to reject pseudonymity—if we let this litigant be pseudonymous, we'd in fairness have lot all these other litigants do the same, and then we'd have a very different and much less transparent system of procedure.[32] [3.] [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 8:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of note The Board rejected this argument, explaining that “[t]he mark must [] be regarded as a whole, including the disclaimed matter, in evaluating similarity to other marks. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
J’ajouterais aussi qu’il apparaît du dossier que n’eût été le battage médiatique, le gouvernement n’aurait pas menacé l’appelant de le destituer. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm by Patricia Hughes
Under section 2, the City of Toronto Act, 2006 acknowledged that one of the things the City must be able to do “in order to provide good government” is to “[d]etermine the appropriate structure f [read post]