Search for: "Mark Richmond"
Results 641 - 660
of 785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Mark's Place. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm
WHEREAS, April is the month in which the people of Virginia joined the Confederate States of America in a four year war between the states for independence that concluded at Appomattox Courthouse; and WHEREAS, Virginia has long recognized her Confederate history, the numerous civil war battlefields that mark every region of the state, the leaders and individuals in the Army, Navy and at home who fought for their homes and communities and Commonwealth in a time very different than ours… [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
Hashish, Islamic Ijtihad: The Key to Islamic Democracy Bridging and Balancing Political Islam and Intellectual Islam, (Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business, Vol. 9, No. 61, Winter 2010).Hans-Martien Ten Napel Th.D., Protestantism, Globalization and the Democratic Constitutional State, (Reshaping Protestantism in a Global Context, Volker Küster, ed., LIT, 2009).Mark Rahdert, Forks Taken and Roads Not Taken: Standing to Challenge Faith-Based Spending, (March 19,… [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:52 pm
Richmond Co. 2010) Here is a civil court decision from Judge Dollard in Civil Richmond, which is well written and correct in all respects on the law. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:23 pm
The market was popularly known as “Richmond Night Market” and the Plaintiff applied for that name as a trademark in English and Chinese, although only the English mark was registered at the time of the hearing of the court action. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:01 am
Dale Welch, a 71-year-old retired property manager who lives in Richmond, Va., swears by it. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
Thomas), Lee Strang (Toledo), Kevin Walsh (Richmond), and Eugene Volokh (UCLA) (disclosure: three personal friends in the above list) filed an amicus brief in support of the free speech claim in the case. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
An inukshuk is a stack of stones traditionally used by the Inuit of the arctic to mark anything from a hunting spot to a food cache. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:18 am
Editor’s Note: Luis A. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
Opponents included death-penalty opponents and the Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union as well as Richmond Commonwealth’s Attorney Michael N. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:35 pm
This Blawg Review comes to you from the Canadian Trademark Blog, resident in Vancouver, British Columbia – a blawg run by several of the talented trademark law practitioners at Clark Wilson LLP. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Pearson, Andy Arneson, Mark Holly, Gregory Perkkio, Arlene M. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm
Mark Gagan. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 4:02 pm
It is not affiliated with Stohn Hay Cafazzo Dembroski Richmond LLP or any of its clients. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Mark D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
This bill is being introduced by Delegate Mark Cole of the 88th District, which spans Stafford, Spotsylvania and Fauquier Counties and the Town of Remington. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:43 am
In deciding whether consumers are likely to be confused, courts will typically look to a number of factors, including: (1) the strength of the mark; (2) the proximity of the goods; (3) the similarity of the marks; (4) evidence of actual confusion; (5) the similarity of marketing channels used; (6) the degree of caution exercised by the typical purchaser; and (7) the defendant's intent. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:43 am
In deciding whether consumers are likely to be confused, courts will typically look to a number of factors, including: (1) the strength of the mark; (2) the proximity of the goods; (3) the similarity of the marks; (4) evidence of actual confusion; (5) the similarity of marketing channels used; (6) the degree of caution exercised by the typical purchaser; and (7) the defendant's intent. [read post]
