Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
App. 2014), cert granted, 337 P.3d 95 (N.M. 2014). [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:37 am
App. 2014), cert granted, 337 P.3d 95 (N.M. 2014). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Tackling a major constitutional question with the level of representation evident in the [cert petition] … would be a risky enterprise. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
It’s there, not in the context of a cross-border shooting, that the Fourth Amendment question in Hernandez seems to matter most. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
But even with the parties and the DoJ agreeing on a particular question of law, the Supreme Court could still have reached a different conclusion. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
As Learned Hand once put it, “no court can make a decree which will bind any one but a party; a court of equity is as much so limited as a court of law; it cannot lawfully enjoin the world at large, no matter how broadly it words its decree. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Yes, without question. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Yes, without question. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
United States, 507 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2007), certified question answered, 2008 OK 26, 183 P.3d 1001 (wrote opinion) The 10th Circuit certified to the Oklahoma Supreme Court to the question of whether wrongful death action for nonviable stillborn fetus existed, under Oklahoma law, on date of delivery of fetus. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:03 pm
Dickerson filed his cert petition.The ensuing ruckus at DOJ was something to behold. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Avitzur, 58 N.Y.2d 108, cert. denied 464 U.S. 817 (1983), the Court of Appeals addressed “the question of the proper role of the civil courts in deciding a matter touching upon religious concerns. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
In response, Hand notes that that the Court has denied at least nineteen petitions raising the same question as presented here, and should do so again, and that in addition, the Supreme Court of Ohio correctly decided the matter. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:27 pm
The more interesting legal question, however, is whether under existing U.S. law, the President has the power to single out individual companies for special tariffs. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
The Supreme Court has never reviewed any of the capital decisions Pryor wrote himself (although a cert petition in one case, discussed below, is currently pending). [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am
Of course, in the PATENT LAW context (which the Ayyadurai matter is not within), the USPTO and courts make decisions about "who invented" something all the time. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Schmitt, 770 F.3d 524, 532 (7th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, ––– U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:07 am
(If you’re interested, you can read the cert. petition, the brief in opposition and the reply by clicking on “Documents” here; you can also read an amicus brief, which I wrote on behalf of nine law professors, including myself, here.) 1. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
" No matter what the precise facts turn out to be, it seems certain that a terrible tragedy occurred. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
No matter how deep and persistent the circuit split, no matter how important and recurring the issue, no matter how ideal the vehicle, Ebenezer’s pool-memo recommendation was always the same: “Humbug! [read post]
