Search for: "Matter of Russell v Russell"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost suggests that, although the Court is “unlikely to be unanimous” if and when it reviews a challenge to state bans on same-sex marriage, “the gay rights ruling that now seems only a matter of time may well strike future generations just as Brown [v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
When up in the courthouse there arose such a clatter; I sprang from my desk to see what was the matter; Had the much-discussed streak ceased to exist? [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:36 pm
Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (of Shakespeares, solicitors) offer us a great example here with this note on audit clauses in IP licences. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Russell (1966), Keyishian v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Cir. 1991); andHester Industries., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
With the noisy midterms firmly behind us, we can at last breathe easy and turn our attention to more pressing matters. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
To read the issue in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
” At Forbes, George Leef weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
One of the participants in the chat room states that he has information, and a conversation ensues. . . .Depending on the agency’s undercover guidelines and the sensitivity of the operation, the agent may need to obtain approvals under the agency guidelines before engaging in further undercover communications on this matter. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
However, in Ysursa v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
Russell in the case of Corridoni v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
King v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:35 am
Omnicare argued that the Supreme Court’s 1991 decision in Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am
Securities fraud is back in the Supreme Court in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
