Search for: "Mitchel v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
Bay Mills Indian Cmty, 134 S.Ct. 2024 – Mitchell G. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
In the United States, copyright vests in a work when it is created (17 U.S.C. 302 (a)) and “fixed in any tangible medium” (17 U.S.C. 102 (a)). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Pettitt v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
First note that in Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
United States, about a “knowingly” provision of a federal firearm statute. [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
United States The EARN IT Act has returned to the Senate and House, which has prompted a response from Riana Pfefferkorn reminding Congress of the problems the proposed legislation causes for encryption, privacy and online speech, without guaranteeing improvement to children’s safety online. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:15 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows state and federal courts to prosecute the same person for the same offense – “that could have important consequences for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:40 am
(That case is not to be confused with Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The Scots Law News and Jonathan Mitchell QC have already covered the issue at length, both links well worth a visit.In the meanwhile, here follows the ruling from the European Court of Human Rights … and lets hope in the light of Lord Penrose’ review of Court of Session business, which resulted in the recently enacted Act of Sederunt (Rules of the Court of Session Amendment No. 2) (Causes in the Inner House) 2010, SSI 2010/30 (pdf) may clear some of these inequalities up, if… [read post]
