Search for: "Montana v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 1,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Watts
  For example, during debate about the Judges’ Bill of 1925, which transferred significant docket-setting discretion to the Court, a Senator from Montana commented that he found it difficult to “yield to the idea that the Supreme Court of the United States ought to have the right in every case to say whether their jurisdiction shall be appealed to or not. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Brandon Gatto
The goal of the endeavor is to counteract the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac Foods Inc. is recalling apples shipped to 36 U.S. states for restaurants and grocery stores because of potential contamination from the bacterium Listeria. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:48 am by Andrew B. Serwin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[3]  Authored by Chief Judge Kozinski, the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:34 pm
” In the matter of Redding, the state's Supreme Court said that the district court’s finding in regards to common venture conflicted with United States Supreme Court precedent in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:25 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Chief Justice John RobertsOn the penultimate business day in June, the United States Supreme Court concluded its term with the announcement of its historic decision in National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius; the Obamacare case that tested the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:12 am by Rachel Sachs
The ACLU praised last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read blog]
3 Jul 2012, 7:41 am by The Federalist Society
The Supreme Court summarily reversed this decision by a vote of 5-4, holding that the state court ruling was in conflict with the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:12 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Bullock, the Court summarily reversed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a state law limiting campaign spending by corporations and unions on state and local elections. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
Bullock, a five-Justice majority threw out a century-old Montana law banning corporate campaign contributions in light of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:59 am by Greg Jacobs
By refusing to hear arguments over whether a state can limit campaign spending by corporations, the Supreme Court refused to reconsider its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by law librarian
The Montana Supreme court pushed back against unlimited campaign spending by upholding the state Corrupt Practices Act, saying that Montana has a unique history of political corruption from the days of the copper kings. [read post]