Search for: "POTTER v. POTTER" Results 641 - 660 of 964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Rick Hasen
” - Trevor Potter, Former Commissioner and Chair, Federal Election Commission, and General Counsel, McCain for President, 2000 and 2008 “Hasen is a national treasure to students and practitioners of election law. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:46 pm
  In California, the governing authority is Potter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 26, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 19-25, 2024 Mergers and Acquisitions—2024 Posted by Victor Goldfeld, Mark Stagliano, and Mark Andriola, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, January 19, 2024 Tags: Acquisition, Activism, Antitrust, Cross-border transactions, Energy, Healthcare, M&A, Merger, Private… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/07/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22nd June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and another v Royal Bank of Scotland, heard 12th January… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:33 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
… The distinction—from life or from edict—happens to be the customary distinction of the literary v. the non-literary work. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
Potter (06-1321) (federal employees protection against retaliation for complaining about age bias in workplace): docket, petition, brief in opposition, reply. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Lovechilde
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Oct. 17, 13 Employment Law: Termination Was the Appellant constructively dismissed.David Potter v. [read post]