Search for: "Parker v. Parker." Results 641 - 660 of 2,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm by Howard Friedman
  Most of his claims were dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, while his complaint regarding observance of a fast day was found not to have amounted to a substantial burden on his free exercise.In Parker v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Timothy B. Lee
(credit: Federal Circuit Historical Society / Aurich Lawson) Forty years ago this week, in the case of Parker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Now the parties have agreed on the scope of a permanent injunction, and this week in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Ronald Mann
That case (and the 1983 decision in Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. v Parker) considered the effect of a failed class action on later filings by the individuals who would have been members of a class if the class action had succeeded. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Chin) notes that plaintiff a full opportunity to litigate this issue in state court. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Parker Drilling Management Services, Inc.] [read post]