Search for: "People v Legall" Results 641 - 660 of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The court acted within its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their recusal motion (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405 [1987]; People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; Mehulic v New York Downtown Hosp., 140 AD3d 417 [1st Dept 2016]; CPLR 2221[e]). [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sultan v Zhu 2020 NY Slip Op 01285 Decided on February 25, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department is the story of a group of people living in a small condominium building. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 5:32 pm
As well, millions of dollars have gone to fund legal aid, promoting access to justice for all. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:31 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Black, Jr. helped Thurgood Marshall of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc. to write the legal brief for Linda Brown, a 10-year-old student in Topeka, Kansas, whose historic case, Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:45 am
Wet money is still legal tender; plus, it will dry out pretty well. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
I admit that I may be overly sympathetic with the defendant in this one on the legally irrelevant ground that even after the friend/informant offered to pay for the stuff, the defendant refused to accept his money. [read post]