Search for: "People v. Speaks"
Results 641 - 660
of 9,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:01 pm
The court’s decision in this case, B.L. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:56 pm
The People's request for a Dunaway/Scott hearing was denied. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Dist. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am
Deweese-Boyd v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm
And we, judges, can take chances on people sometimes. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:23 pm
The post Reality Winner, Family Speak Out After Documentary Screening appeared first on Whistleblower Network News. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:57 am
This is the government as sovereign, threatening “civil penalties up to $125,000 for violations, and up to $250,000 for violations that are the result of willful, wanton, or malicious conduct” if people don’t speak the way the government tells them to speak. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:44 pm
In Grotheer v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:13 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
For those who are interested, the seminal case is Little v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm
The so-called castle doctrine was the subject of the Michigan Supreme Court’s July 29 opinion affirming the conviction in People v Richardson, No. 141752. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:39 am
Any employee who has spent a fair amount of time in the workplace knows you will find people that are - politely speaking - simply jerks. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:01 am
(See, e.g., R.A.V. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 8:11 pm
You can get the full text of the articles, including Sexually Speaking: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and the First Amendment after Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
Nonetheless, the 9th notes, people change beliefs. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:32 pm
Madison was wrongly decided (or in some classes, that Marbury v. [read post]
