Search for: "Poore v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 5,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Professor Sherry Colb argues on my blog, the Court’s cases do a poor job of justifying the viability line. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:03 am
Court annuls Commissioner of Human Rights' determination because it lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of unlawful discriminationMatter of Suffolk County Community Coll. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 03184, Decided on April 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human found Suffolk County Community College had engaged in unlawful racially discriminatory practices against… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court had heard argument in Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:24 am
Court annuls Commissioner of Human Rights' determination because it lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of unlawful discriminationMatter of Suffolk County Community Coll. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 61 AD3d 881The Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human found Suffolk County Community College had engaged in unlawful racially discriminatory practices against one of its employees and retaliated against him. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am by Chris Seaton
When the Public Defenders, the first line of defense for the poor in the state call bullshit, you might want to rethink your stance. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MICHAEL GRIFFITH, No. 08-3668-cvUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2009 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
For the most part, critics of the Hyde Amendment argue that it authorizes discrimination against poor women. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:47 pm
When it injected poison into the veins of William Earl Lynd, the state of Georgia restarted the machinery of death, which came to a halt as states awaited a decision in Baze v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Fifth, the local authority’s decision can only be challenged by judicial review which is costly and narrow and is a poor replacement for an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber). [read post]