Search for: "Price v. Chicago"
Results 641 - 660
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2010, 4:37 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter discussing the gun show case writes, among other things, So, along with Chicago and DC trying to keep poor people from exercising their “fundamental right” by pricing permits/licenses/training/registration out of their reach, now California is trying to reduce the Second Amendment to a “want” instead of a “RIGHT”. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:05 pm
USA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Aurora rejected that offer, and an attorney in Hall’slaw office proposed a sale price of $425,000, which would have meant a loss to thelender of about $340,000.It is undisputed that on June 18, 2009, Aurora recorded a notice of default.The notice of default used this (obviously form) language: “The Beneficiary or itsdesignated agent declares that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence tocontact the borrower as required by California Civil Code section 2923.5, or… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Chicago. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris - Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme; Cassina SpA v Alivar Srl and Galliani Host Arredamenti Srl (IPKat) Finland Finnish trademark office changing its classification practice regarding ‘retail services’ in class 35 (Class 46) France Paris – Size matters: a correlation between luxury products price and logo size (Class 46) Validity of 3D trade mark (? [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
Who I Am: My name is Huma Rashid, and I am a 3L at John Marshall Law School in Chicago, IL. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Lewitton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
Best Buy “Price Match” Refusal Would Be Consumer FraudThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.A Best Buy customer stated plausible claims that the retailer violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and engaged in unjust enrichment by failing to honor its advertised “price match guarantee,” the federal district court in Chicago has ruled.In a class action complaint, the customer alleged that he purchased a 42-inch… [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Fisher-Price Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:46 am
" Kevin Thompson ("FTC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
” The Court also held on Tuesday, in Samantar v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
The items I wanted to purchase where I was informed that the price tag and the shelf signs were wrong and the real price was much higher. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
Ebert does have a Ph.D. from Stanford, and a J.D. from the University of Chicago. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:15 pm
USA v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
