Search for: "Rock v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
The reason that your driver’s license issued by your home state is valid in the rest of the United States is because the states have voluntarily entered into reciprocity agreements to recognize each other’s licenses. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
The United States Attorney did not want the death penalty. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
To those who have been under a rock, Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:55 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
And those right-to-marry cases cannot be expanded to include the right that Din argues for—the right to live in the United States with one’s alien spouse—because we identify implied rights not by looking to our case law but by looking to this country’s history and traditions. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Notwithstanding, that claim fails for the simple reason that the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
This question, posed in relation to the law of the Bahamas, was recently answered by the Privy Council (Lords Mance, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Sir Kim Lewison) in Gold Rock Limited v Nylund Hylton [2015] UKPC 17. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
United States, in which the Court voided the conviction of a man who had taken spent shell casings from a government bombing range because he thought they were abandoned. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, 80 FR 1942–02 (2015) (emphasis added). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 (1989)), and the court concluded that Norfolk did not pass the ordinance out of “censorial intent. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:00 am
” – was the issue facing the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Brady v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:30 am
Id.The United States Supreme Court found such an intent in the Lanham Act inSteele v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Rock music is a valid and highly recognized form of creative artistic expression in the United States and world. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court * Keyword Advertising Doesn’t Create General Jurisdiction–Rocke v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 pm
Adhesives Research, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
In so holding, the court distinguished the United States Supreme Court’s earlier decision in Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:00 am
’ Article 287(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (LOSC), which both States are party to, requires States to select a preferred means of binding dispute resolution involving third parties, and if they fail to do so, arbitration under Annex VII becomes the default means – unless reservations have been made in writing with regard to optional exceptions (see below). [read post]
