Search for: "S B Mart Inc" Results 641 - 660 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 10:49 am by Richard D. Worth
Wal-Mart and the other defendants moved for dismissal under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim respectively. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1319- 20 (Fed. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1319- 20 (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
It is written, edited, and produced by Frederick B. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:55 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Me llega una muy buena nota de Martín Böhmer (Cippec, Udesa) que dice cosas distintas sobre ese tema puntual, pero también las escala y las encuadra a otro nivel. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:19 am by Matt Osenga
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:43 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., the case in which plaintiffs filed a class action alleging that Wal-Mart discriminates against women in violation of Title VII.As we noted in prior posts, one of the (many) legal questions at issue in Dukes is the propriety of a classwide determination of punitive damages for Title VII claims. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:31 pm by Russell Jackson
  In doing so, the court winnowed the products involved down to J&J's Baby Shampoo and Wal-Mart's Equate Tearless Baby Wash. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 191 F.3d 283, 291-93 (2d Cir. 1999), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Steven G. Pearl
Here is the summary of the opinion:Plaintiffs allege that Wal-Mart, Inc., discriminates against women in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]