Search for: "SILVER v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
The worst of which is Ramirez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:59 am
The much-awaited Elonis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 10:36 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
As the IPKat previously noted, had a choreographer directed Ribeiro on how to perform the dance, then the issue of ownership of copyright would not be clear cut.There are two reported UK cases on dance copyright [Holland v Vivian Van Damm Productions Ltd [1936] MCC 69 and Massine v De Basil (1938) [1936-45] MCC 233]. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
Yesterday, at the State of the Net conference in Washington DC, a report by the ‘Internet Safety Technical Task Force‘ was launched. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:27 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 6:47 am
David and Ryan v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Germany v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
Hall v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:23 am
Broadcast-v-Dman-Complaint [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:49 am
There are a number of causes of action that are brought to bear in these situations but no "silver bullet" even though as can seen by the lower court judgment reviewed in Chicago Title Insurance v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
A few of my prior postings on the subject as we put this issue to bed for awhile: Kaye v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]