Search for: "STATE v B J J J"
Results 641 - 660
of 6,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:15 am
Sections 1132(a)(1)(B) and 1132(a)(3). [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
GB 2 390 595 B (“GB 595”) were infringed by Manitou. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In addition to the normal factors to consider when determining if there was likelihood of confusion (global appreciation, assessment through the eyes of the reasonably well informed and circumspect average consumer, etc.), Hacon J drew particular attention to Maier v ASOS plc [2015] EWCA Civ 220 (see IPKat analysis here). [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:31 am
This post was written by Amy J. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ gave three key reasons in support of his conclusion: The structure of the Policy expressly stated that the insured perils were subject always to the exclusions. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
The Sixth Circuit granted en banc review last week in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:28 pm
Gabelli v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Ward v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
See also §1611(a), (b)(1), (b)(2). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
" State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
And the saga will continue – Arnold J’s judgment is under appeal [EDIT: decision expected by April 2017], and the decision by the General Court will most likely end up with the ECJ, given the stakes.To recap briefly – and I emphasize briefly – after the referreal to the ECJ which had answered the questions posed by Arnold J somewhat cryptically, Arnold J found that the shape of the KitKat bar was not barred from registration by by… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Dec. 11, 2015) (J. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Dec. 11, 2015) (J. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:37 am
F.J.A.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:52 am
State, 331 Md. 179 (1993) and Gray v. [read post]
