Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD" Results 641 - 660 of 854
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
(5) A discussion of specific policy recommendations to deter the activities of notorious foreign infringers and encourage foreign businesses industry norms that promote the protection of intellectual property globally, including addressing— (A) whether notorious foreign infringers that engage in significant infringing should be prohibited by the laws of the States from seeking to raise capital United States, including offering stock to the public; and (B) whether the… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm by Ryan Radia
Supreme Court decision, Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
In other housekeeping matters, the Court called for the record in Floyd v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am by Terry Hart
As the Supreme Court said in Eldred v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
His work is going towards First Amendment because the other alternatives won’t get the job done and the present solution risks a serious chill.53 cell phone search cases found in his search for reported opinions after Arizona v. [read post]
  Whereas the latter had stated that if Jinse entered into an insolvency procedure, that would trigger a right to rescind and therefore the refund guarantee (Article XII.3), the bonds did not. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jefferies co-authored a letter to the Guardian last Monday, stating that CFA reforms would “effectively remove the opportunity of people of ordinary means to seek redress when they have been libelled or intruded upon, or where they need to defend a libel claim”. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 9:25 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0063, 2011 MT 249N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm by johntfloyd
We feel it’s time to examine both the legislative history, and the statutory application, of crime victims’ restitution acts, both of which were discussed at some length by the Second Circuit on August 18, 2011 in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is expressly stated therein that the answer relates to the case in which neither the disclaimer nor the subject-matter excluded by it from the scope of the claim has a basis in the application as filed. [read post]