Search for: "See v. See" Results 641 - 660 of 122,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2008, 12:00 am
(See the order posted on the court's online docket.)This is the case in which the California Court of Appeal reversed a $5 million punitive damages award and ordered a retrial on punitive damages because the plaintiffs improperly presented the jury with evidence of Unocal's dissimilar conduct towards nonparties, in violation of State Farm v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:32 pm
Hall, 2009 BCCA 329 (see the SCC News Release here).Picketts v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
While consistent with the recent Federal Circuit decision addressing similar issues (see "Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:39 am by traceydennis
Al Rawi and Others v Security Service and Others Court of Appeal “The principle that a litigant should be able to see and hear all the evidence, seen and heard by a court determining his case, was so fundamental and so embedded in the common law, that, in the absence of parliamentary authority, it should not be overridden by a judge in an ordinary civil claim. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
For those in DC wanting to see the historic argument in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
(see "Sequenom Petitions for Certiorari"), a total of twenty-two amicus briefs have been filed encouraging the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]