Search for: "Short v. Davis " Results 641 - 660 of 979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
Judge Liman, who has dismissed ADA website cases based on lack of standing, found that standing was sufficiently pled in Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Richard Hunt
Judge Liman, who has dismissed ADA website cases based on lack of standing, found that standing was sufficiently pled in Davis v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am by Peter Mahler
., the Second Department’s 1999 decision in Matter of Davis and the First Department’s 2013 decision in Gjuraj v Uplift Elevator Corp. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Martinez, the Court gave “disappointingly short shrift to [First] Amendment values. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:34 am by Russ Bensing
  The court uses the primary purpose test, as developed in Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under a line of Delaware cases, a provision that the entity shall indemnify an owner, officer, or director “to the fullest extent permitted by law” provides a right of advancement by implication (Davis v EMSI Holding Co., No. 12854-VCS [Del Ch May 3, 2017]). [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:16 am
Bank, University of California, Los Angeles, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, Compensation guidelines, Compensation ratios, Corporate culture, Executive Compensation,Labor markets, Management, Taxation Political Contributions and Lobbying Proposals Posted by Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Thursday, August 18, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am by Rob Robinson
Law professors Joshua Davis and Anupama Reddy suggest algorithms might provide DOJ clearer trails to litigate such collusive schemes. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 2:33 pm
  The court determined that the additional claims were derivative of the breach of contract claim and that the insurers did not owe a duty to defend the town pursuant to the insurance policy.This case was originally summarized by Shanti Davies and originally edited by David Pilley.Here is the case citation: Rocky Mountain House (Town) v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 12:26 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
This hypothetical was actually litigated in the recent case of Almanor Lakeside Villas Owners Assn. v. [read post]