Search for: "State Road Department v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
After saying that Congress has taxing power, the provision does say — without elaboration – that Congress also has the power “to provide for….the general welfare of the United States.” Congress customarily does not just hand out money to the states without strings attached. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:09 pm
Martin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
United States - and it was a pretty big deal. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
State Bar 19 Cal. 3d 359 (1977) and Bates v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
All roads lead to Rome China. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm
United States (1996), the Court upheld the pretextual use of the traffic code (which was prolix enough to be violated sooner or later by just about any car on the road). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Some loose yet interesting stuff that I came across recently during a long stroll around the internet that never made it into a post of its own.A Smashing Good TimeThe Appellate Division,4th Department, held in Franklin Corp v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
" Erie County v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:59 pm
MAPLES V. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
The concept of adverse possession was subsequently adopted in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
His failure to do so, to pin the blame on Mustafa, when he did blurt out that he wasn't the shooter, undermines the credibility of his trial testimony.The majority held, notably in contrast to the United States Supreme Court's misguided decision in Berghuis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In Lane v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm
In Lane v. [read post]
