Search for: "State of Michigan Judicial Court"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The Court cited its 2015 decision in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
While that may be true, using that sort of judicial reasoning to reach a result not found in the express language of the statute is a favorite target for certain Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
§ 524(a) makes a state-court judgment void ab initio when entered against a debtor whose dischargeable debts had been discharged, or whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine compels federal courts to respect the state-court judgment. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:34 pm
The questions presented are: (1) whether the Fourth Circuit erred in holding that the ERISA statute provided a district court discretion to award fees only to a prevailing party; and (2) whether a party is entitled to fees pursuant to the ERISA statute when she persuades a district court that a violation of ERISA has occurred, successfully secures a judicially-ordered remand requiring a redetermination of entitlement to benefits, and subsequently receives the… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:38 am
A 2004 Michigan Court of Appeals decision had held the contrary, but the Michigan Supreme Court overruled that precedent. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:32 am
” But a court must be careful not to pierce the veil of judicial impartiality. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
And, Amy Wax reflected on the courts' role in the social-welfare-rights revolution. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:42 pm
Today, Drew Boortz has an interesting post on the Michigan Film Office granting a 40% refundable tax credit for the development of a video game, the first time this has happened in the state. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 4:05 pm
Through Loper Bright, the Court has now killed any form of judicial deference to agency regulations. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm
Court of appeals judges might hesitate to upset what would seem like an emerging judicial consensus. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit stayed the district court’s injunction in early October, agreeing with the Wisconsin legislature’s contentions that a federal court should not change rules so close to an election and that political, not judicial, officials should decide when a pandemic justifies changes to otherwise valid rules. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:46 am
On Tuesday, April 24, the Court will hear arguments in a case challenging the federal government’s decision to put into trust land purchased by an Indian Tribe in Michigan, in order to facilitate the Tribe’s building of a casino. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 495, 539 , and Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am
The court therefore stayed Ackerman pending the resolution of the Koch proceedings in state court. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:38 am
[National Law Journal] * Michigan State is fighting hard to keep the advice of its in-house attorneys privileged. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
While the Sixth Circuit here appropriately allowed Tennessee, Michigan, Kentucky, and Ohio to appear before the same panel on the same day to defend their marriage laws, other circuits have not provided their states the sam [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
The federal appellate court was unimpressed with the above analysis from it's Michigan counterpart; inferring that their unpublished opinion was weak on judicial application of significant precedent. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 3:28 am
” All governments then, state and federal, are required to protect the rights of person, property, and contract, without interfering with rights of inheritance, property, judicial action, etc. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am
DeCiccio (which held that the Second Amendment protects dirks and police batons), as well as between this decision and the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. [read post]
