Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
”) Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There were no statements in open court this week. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Noting that the providers in this case were free to form their own groups, oppose the SEIU, and present their complaints to the state, the appeals concluded that under the Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 3:42 am
Here are the materials in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
The Role of the Courts: Stare Decisis in Constitutional Cases and Under State Law --Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Ruth Okediji, University of Minnesota Law SchoolProf. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The blog of the Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York profiles Charlotte Smallwood-Cook, the first woman District Attorney in New York State. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
The employee then sued for age discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and the district court granted summary judgment to Optomec. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 2:15 am
Supreme Court in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
Covidien then removed the action to federal court; however, the federal district court sent the action back to state court because of UFRF’s 11th Amendment immunity. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
“Despite the district court’s and our own repeated invitations to explain the urgent need for the Executive Order to be placed immediately into effect, the Government submitted no evidence to rebut the States’ argument that the district court’s order merely returned the nation temporarily to the position it has occupied for many previous years. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
Bush in 2003, placed a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the executive order until full arguments in the case brought against the Trump administration by Washington State and Minnesota could be heard. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
"Whether the states had standing to bring this case was addressed in the following:The [federal] Government argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the States have no standing to sue. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
In short, the Ninth Circuit held that the states (Washington and Minnesota) had standing and met the requirements for a preliminary injunction (styled a temporary restraining order in the district court). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
Trump, in Massachusetts District Court here). [read post]
