Search for: "State v. D. Allen"
Results 641 - 660
of 854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Allen. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
When there was no arbitration agreement between the parties, without a joint memo or a joint application of the parties, the High Court ought not to have referred the parties to arbitration” (paragraph 39).The Court rejected the respondent’s implied authority argument stating that counsel should not act on implied authority unless there is exigency of circumstances demanding immediate adjustment of suit by agreement or compromise (Byram Pestonji Gariwala v Union Bank of… [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
At the end of the 19th century, the United States government was much smaller than it is today. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Novartis Pharms., No. 5:11–CV–680–D, 2013 WL 4854488, at *3 (Sept. 11, 2013). [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
In Thomasson v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Silbey: one of the productive comparisons b/t Anita Allen’s and other work was that Allen discussed harm to individuals v. harm to systems or organizations. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
§ 355 (b)(1), (d). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
Allen, decided with Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
§ 20-1-119 applies to claims against the State); Allen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
LEXIS 1514 (B.A.P. 9th Cir., 2006) COUNSEL: Paul Sala, Allen & Sala, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellant. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
The FTC has lamented post-merger price hikes for life sustaining drugs (see FTC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
If the lovely things he said about them are true, they’d better polish their halos and put up their hourly rates. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 7:09 am
Allen, 2016 VT 89By Elizabeth KruskaWhen we’re talking about divorces, Vermont is an equitable distribution state. [read post]
