Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 641 - 660
of 32,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:51 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:23 pm
In a 4-3 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:45 am
In the recent decision of the IPEC in Stone v Wenman, the court reiterated and applied some key principles in the law of passing off. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 12:44 pm
Johnson argued that federal courts applying the ACCA are bound by the Florida Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:45 am
But consider a case such as People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States released their opinion on Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:50 am
Miguel v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2011] UKPC 14; [2011] WLR (D) 198 “A constitutional provision which exempted both existing laws and enactments which altered existing laws from its protection did not extend to an enactment which altered a law that had existed before the Constitution came into force but had since been abolished. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:18 pm
When challenged, a former New York state resident will be forced to show by “clear and convincing evidence” that they intended to moving to Florida or another one of the sunshine states permanently and not just a rouse to avoid their former state of residences income tax burden. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:36 am
Force majeure clauses relieve a party from its obligation to perform under a contract on the occurrence of a specific event or state of affairs. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Therefore, the trial court erred in allowing the State to ask petitioner "were-they-lying" questions. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:42 pm
Kreimer cites the US litigation in Centre for Democracy & Technology v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Carrington and Rohan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:52 am
U.S. v. [read post]
