Search for: "State v. House" Results 641 - 660 of 28,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
United States and some miscellaneous examples drawn from congressional records. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Although the Arizona State Legislature is Republican-led in both houses, repeal bills proposing to undo Hazelrigg surfaced with limited bipartisan support and passed the House on April 24, 2024. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 5, 2024, a jury in California federal court found a former corporate executive liable for insider trading in SEC v. [read post]
After this, the Arizona House of Representatives erupted into chants of “shame” after Republican members voted to adjourn instead of discussing a bill that would repeal the state’s 1864 abortion ban. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
It’s four years of scorched earth when Donald Trump retakes the White House. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Calabresi
United States on jurisdictional grounds is a far better way of deciding Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:00 am by Whitney Hodges
Critics of the bill charge, among other complaints, that these changes would undermine the investment in much-needed new housing amid the state’s housing shortage and destabilize the rental housing market. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]