Search for: "State v. John T. Williams" Results 641 - 660 of 1,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
The seeming rigidity with which justices hold to their past dissents in an area of law makes Chief Justice John Roberts’ concurrence in June Medical Services v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Article II, Section I explains “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” and no one else. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm by Zack Bluestone
CNO John Richardson responded by clarifying that FON patrols are “part of routine navigation in international waters, consistent with international rules there: I don’t see how these could be interpreted as provocative in any way. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am by Steve Hall
Under state law, Williams, now 18, must serve about 12 years of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  (Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm by Tia Sewell
President Trump has stated that if the Chinese company ByteDance, which currently owns TikTok, doesn’t sell its U.S. operations to an American company by September 15, he will ban the app. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:03 am by Adam Feldman
Justices John Paul Stevens and William Brennan tended to vote alongside the more liberal justices during the years when Warren Burger and William Rehnquist were chief justice. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:01 am
Third, you can’t make up stories like the ones from real life. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 7:44 am by Dan Bressler
‘I don’t love what Weil did here and I think it could have been handled other ways, but I am not sure whether it rises to the level of a new trial.'” “Waivable Conflict Not Validly Waived, Leads To Remand for New Trial” — “In United States v. [read post]