Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 641 - 660
of 26,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
The Court considered the principle established in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Onibiyo [1996] QB 768, that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:42 am
§ §1331 et seq.) did not preempt a state-law claim for deceptive advertising of light cigarettes. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:27 pm
In Lacey v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:25 pm
After briefing was completed in this case and while a decision was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
The State should have affirmatively advised the trial court that such report either did or did not exist or, if the State was likewise uncertain, ought to have sought from the court the opportunity to clarify whether such report was made. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:34 am
Barrett, 903 F.3d 166 ( 2d Cir. 2018), was vacated by the Supreme Court in a GVR order on June 28, 2019, in light of United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:15 am
Additional Resources: Holt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
“In light of the appellant's status not simply as a parolee generally but as a parolee for whom a parole retake arrest warrant was outstanding, we hold, pursuant to the balancing test of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:34 am
Cuiellette asked to return to work and provided a doctor's note stating that he was limited to "permanent light duty - administrative work only. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:04 pm
In light of this holding, the second question was not addressed.The full opinion is available in PDF. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
When the scope of the interstate commerce authority expanded during World War II, with the Supreme Court’s 1942 Wickard v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:15 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reversed and remanded a defendant’s DUI convictions in light of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Missouri v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 7:54 am
As the Court stated in Thornhill v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
Court of Appeals pointed out recently in Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
**Returning to the 2012 law review article, the introduction does assertThis Article sheds light on the role that patent law played in the light bulb's emergence. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
HT to Gary Born and Thomas Snider, whose recent post at the Kluwer Arbitration Blog brought to light the Case of the Day, Sojitz Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:04 am
United States v. [read post]
