Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 641 - 660
of 28,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
Perhaps a child-centered approach can restore our humanity after decades of inhumane practice and policies by state and non-state actors around the world [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm
Bergeson, Managing Partner, B&C; James V. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:03 pm
Bergeson, Managing Partner, B&C; James V. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
” A recent empirical study, for example, highlighted the relative effectiveness of auditory alarms in re-engaging inattentive drivers.[10] Advances in this direction continued to develop increasingly complex alarm systems.[11] The coupling of intelligent “alarms” that continuously monitor and account for live conditions of the road and alert drivers accordingly must be weighed against the explicit, written rules of the road. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 10:21 am
Supreme Court held in Rose v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
” “United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:50 am
Most often, it is the custodial parent that claims the child because of the residency requirement, which states that the child must have lived with you for more than six months. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:43 am
According to a statement that Tennessee Coordinator of Elections Mark Goins gave The Tennessean, the state’s Supreme Court “made it clear” in the 2023 case Falls v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:36 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in Rice v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm
” At its best, the constitutional presidency would promote “the stability of the system of administration,” reinforcing a rule of law that lays the foundation for the rest of us to live our lives and plan for the future with as much certainty as one can reasonably expect in a democracy. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
In a 1972 case, Healy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Such a spread would no doubt result in death to even more innocent civilians on all sides, more young Israelis would lose their lives fighting that wider war, and a return to peace would become even more elusive than it already is. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Fair enough.But the United States decided to go further. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
