Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 641 - 660
of 4,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Noble, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1473 (24 June 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) British Airways Plc v Grundy [2008] EWCA Civ 875 (28 July 2008) ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 880 (28 July 2008) JT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 878 (28 July 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mason v Ministry of… [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 11:32 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 4:31 pm
College of Wales v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or under a… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:50 pm
And so I've been curious to watch the reaction to the 7th Circuit's decision in Schrock v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:04 am
In the motion, the drug companies argued that under the Supreme Court's decision in Pliva v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Supreme Court Smith, R. v [2011] UKSC 37 (20 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Barkshire & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim B3 (20 July 2011) Hewgill & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1778 (20 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Interactive Investor Trading Ltd v City Index Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 837 (20 July 2011) AQ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 833 (20 July 2011) Drake v… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:48 am
The UCC requires the maker of a promissory note to pay the obligation to “a person entitled to enforce the instrument. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:01 am
But "Ford refused to take a license to Sisvel's patents," the complaint states. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:56 pm
" In 2008, "the Supreme Court agreed with the pre-emption policy in a case [Riegel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:14 am
The salon operators alleged facts sufficient to show that the false advertising claims were material to consumers’ purchasing decisions, the court concluded.The decision in Salon FAD v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:16 am
Readers of this blog may remember that last July Lindsay Lohan sued Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. and Rockstar Games, the makers of the video game Grand Theft Auto V (GTAV). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:31 am
Higginbotham v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Should Software Makers Pay? [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:25 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Luis v. [read post]
