Search for: "State v. Myers" Results 641 - 660 of 1,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2015, 3:41 am by Broc Romanek
As noted in this blog by Kevin LaCroix, perhaps a state attorney general will be the first to bring an action in the end. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:26 am
Pickering’s balancing test applies only when the employee speaks “as a citizen upon matters of public concern” rather than “as an employee upon matters only of personal interest” [Connick v Myers, 461 US 138].5. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
The district court denied Plaintiffs-Appellants' motion for a preliminary injunction, granted Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, and awarded attorney fees to Non-City Defendants-Appellees to be paid by Little Red Barn. 08a0189p.06 2008/05/21 Myers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court indicated in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, constitutional free speech rights are not implicated when only matters of a personal interest to the individual, in contrast to matters of public concern, are involved.. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Earlier this year, the Federal Court of Appeal, in Bristol-Myers Squibb Canada Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am by Brian A. Comer
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 180 S.C. 436, 186 S.E. 383 (1936) (tobacco plug with tack in it);Irick v. [read post]