Search for: "State v. Peters" Results 641 - 660 of 5,658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Stacey Gray argued that the American Data Privacy and Protection Act would provide protections that are stronger than state protections, establishing a strong national standard for privacy. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The state had sent notice of an alleged violation before the suit was filed—that's enough to say an action had commenced. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am by Emma Snell
Scott Wong and Peter Nicholas report for NBC News. [read post]
., vacated its prior decision, and reversed the district court’s judgment that the claims of patent at issue were not invalid (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
Under the heading “competing interests,” the authors state that “they have no competing interests. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Rev. 582, 608 (1984) (stating that the project explicitly did “not take ‘traditional Restatement form’”). [3] Draft No. 1, supra note 1, at ix. [4] See Shyamkrishna Balganesh & Peter S. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:26 am by admin
Gale state that he had done a Bayesian analysis? [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]