Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 641 - 660
of 4,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm
In Fish v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
(Before July 1, 2017, the agency responsible for collecting sales and use taxes was the State Board of Equalization. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:08 pm
Thus, courts must place arbitration agreements on an equal footing with other contracts, Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
Payne, 34 A.3d 370 (Conn. 2012); State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:43 pm
Here are two propositions that United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
It also dismissed the due process claim on the ground that MAUM did not use the channels available to it to appeal the Zoning Board’s decision to state court. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:03 am
The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Gantler v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
") AC36012 - State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:40 am
She believes that the bill is an attempt to ban abortions without directly challenging the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
In 2002 the United States Supreme Court decided Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v NLRB. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
His local draft board rejected the claim, and he appealed to the Kentucky State Appeal Board. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:46 am
Those cases are equally clear that the website operator is not liable for user-posted defamatory content per 47 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.In Todd Allen Clark v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
By the time the NAACP lawyers embarked on the path that would ultimately lead them to victory in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Board of Education is largely forgotten. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
See also Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. [read post]
