Search for: "State v. Twist"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Has the government been using its copy service to spy on defense work product for the past 10 years?
3 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
Those are the allegations in this motion to dismiss filed by Howard Srebnick and Rossana Arteaga-Gomez in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
In a recently reported case out of the Northern District of Ohio (Lazette v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:01 am
., BRT, A Tax Agency Rises from the Dead, Tax Law as Subterfuge: Best Use Valuation v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 10:33 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:34 am
” In her dissenting opinion joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that the majority opinion “twists precedent” and “distorts Miller and Montgomery beyond recognition. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:46 am
” There was another twist. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:16 am
Additional Resources: Grubb v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992); Martin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
Dunn v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:40 am
Dunn v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:24 pm
Neasbitt, 105 S.W.3d at 117; see Twist v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 4:44 am
Dozier v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
--Marin v Bloom Roofing Sys, Inc, EDMich: In a case with an unusual twist, although two Hispanic construction workers failed to set forth a winning pretext argument that their employer prevented them from developing the necessary job skills because of their race, a federal district court in Michigan, on its own accord, unearthed a prima facie case of race discrimination from the evidence they presented. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:52 am
In James Cable, LLC, v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Berghuis v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:07 am
But here is a new twist: What if the state sues a doctor for violating a patient's privacy? [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
Harris: I’ll have a half double decaffeinated half-caf, with a twist of lemon. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:44 pm
But it's what the statute written in 1981 says, and it's absolutely what the Supreme Court of Ohio said in 1996 in a case called State v. [read post]
