Search for: "Strange v. Powers" Results 641 - 660 of 964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 10:47 am
The date is 15 June and the venue is Shanghai so, if you happen to be there, or not too far away, and want to enjoy a powerful and informative experience, you can get full details here. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Karen Tani
Strangely, she treats power as something that can only deter justice; she says nothing about how power determines which vision of justice prevails. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:50 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
: "Supreme Court Talks Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them" pjblack.me/wIQX1h a very strange copyright lawsuit: "Keep Your Hands off My Briefs: Lawyers Sue Westlaw, Lexis" pjblack.me/xpIT5K #lwb486 too little, too late to save flickr? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zlBfbE (Matt Miller) Proper Preparation for the Meet-and-Confer Pays Off - bit.ly/xqNihW (Leonard Deutchman) Survey Says… Information Governance and Predictive Coding Adoption Slow, But Likely to Gain Steam – bit.ly/yeYgab (Matthew Nelson) Technology and Litigation: Strange Bedfellows? [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:18 am by Eoin Daly
Discrimination against teachers with deviant lifestyles has a robust pedigree in Ireland: before the enactment of the current legislation, the High Court upheld, in Flynn v Power [1985], the dismissal, by a Catholic secondary school, of an unmarried teacher who began to live with a married man and became pregnant. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Strangely, the majority opinion seems to forget these points when it says, “we conclude that the text of § 1514A(a) is unambiguous in limiting whistleblower protection to employees of public companies[.] [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:57 pm by Andis Kaulins
Although we definitely share the sentiments of the dissenting Justices Breyer and Alito -- a strange alliance politically and judicially, but understandable in terms of their intellectual principles -- we have to agree with the SCOTUS majority of Justices in Golan v. [read post]