Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 641 - 660
of 302,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), the ranking Republican on the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust, released a statement agreeing with the merging parties on the same day that Senator Kohl released his letter. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
NE TESEKKÜR EDER? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:15 pm
After all, what kid doesn't enjoy getting their hands messy creating a new masterpiece? [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:00 pm
L'acte de recours puis le mémoire de recours, et enfin un autre courrier de l'Opposante avaient été envoyés à la Titulaire par courrier recommandé sans avis de réception. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:19 pm
So are the representatives of the office of C&R. [9]To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 8:29 am
The post Fairness in Class Action Bill, Isn’t. appeared first on Legal Reader. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
The appeal is inadmissible under R 101(1) (see also T 229/03 [4]). [6] I find the EPO’s decision tough on the appellant because the agreement also contained the following provisions: “The oppositions filed by BP at the EPO and listed in the attached schedule all relate directly to the business assets that were transferred. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 3:35 pm
- Syngja og dansa - Elda á eldavélina mÃna - snúa mér à marga marga marga hringi - hjóla um á þrÃhjólinu mÃnu - setja alls konar poka og Ãlát (ekki plastpoka samt ) yfir mig og reyna að labba blindandi - troða mér ofan Ã… [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:57 am
Dans une récente étude signalés par Frédérique sur la liste Juriconnexion et intitulé The Opportunity for Firms, Librarians, and Knowledge Management : Implementing a Successful Knowledge Management Strategy, l'éditeur juridique américain West reconnaît le rôle clé des documentalistes juridiques dans le knowledge management (KM). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the remuneration of this representative is part of the adequate costs under R 88(1).In decision T 930/92 [4.3] the BoA has come to the conclusion that costs amounting to 8750 DM for remunerating the professional representative for preparing for and attending the OPs during three and a half days were adequate. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:24 am
On appeal from [2016] EWCA Crim 1617 The case considered whether a criminal offence can be committed under the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 92(1)(b) or (c) (selling, offering for sale or distribution/possession with a view) where the proprietor of the registered trade mark has given its consent to the application of the sign which is its registered trade mark or has itself applied its own registered trade mark to the goods, but has not given its consent to the sale, distribution or possession of them. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 2:57 am
By mistake, the opponent's representative failed to timely file the request under R.84(1). [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:49 am
« Je n’y vais pas, pensaient-ils peut-être, alors en quoi cet endroit me concerne-t-il? [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:12 pm
Snyder, the R-Word is looking awfully scandalous these days, and this issue isn’t going away . . . . [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
Bunlardan birisi de akıllı telefonlara yüklenebilen gelen ve giden telefon görüşmelerini kaydeden görüşme kayıt uygulamalarıdır. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
La section de dépôt a donc, en vertu de la R.56(1) CBE, invité le demandeur à déposer les dessins apparemment manquants. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:14 am
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/25/2023 "T H E W H I T E H OU S E W A S H I N G T O N S e p t e m b e r 2 9 , 2 0 2 3 P r e s i d e n t i a l D e t e r m i n a t i o n N o . 2 0 2 3 - 1 4 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE SUBJECT: Presidential Determination with Respect to the Efforts of Foreign Governments Regarding Trafficking in Persons Consistent with… [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 11:01 am
The fact that the appellant had no opportunity to comment on all the grounds on which the decision appears to have been based constituted a substantial procedural violation within the meaning of A 113(1) and R 103. [5.4] For these reasons the decision under appeal must be set aside and the case remitted to the department of first instance for further prosecution. [5.5] In these circumstances, it is equitable to order the reimbursement of the appeal fee in accordance with R… [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
R 29(1) EPC 1973 specifies that the matter for which protection is sought be defined in terms of the technical features of the invention. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:28 am
Or, depuis 1994, l'Institut canadien de la propriété intellectuelle et de l'Université McGill ont réuni quelques uns des meilleurs praticiens dans le domaine et ont mis sur pied une série de cours d'été concernant la… [read post]
