Search for: "U.S. v. Stanford" Results 641 - 660 of 1,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am by Florian Mueller
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:40 pm by Matt Gluck
In the latest development in the Trump v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Howell also shared a discussion with Alex Stamos, the director of the Stanford Internet Observatory, about electoral disinformation on the Lawfare Podcast. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Obama administration decided that it would not ask the Supreme Court to stay a decision by the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:16 pm by Cal Law
Supreme Court decisions removing limits on independent campaign expenditures by corporations (Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
An ISS analysis of majority-opposed directors in 2010 found that this investor opposition can have a significant impact on companies and boards, and often results in the departure of directors or prods companies to address the underlying issues that may have fueled shareholder dissent. 2) The Race to the Bottom: U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
Karlan, of Stanford Law School and (temporarily) the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:59 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
Board of Directors of City Trusts, 353 U.S. 230 (1957) and ultimately in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]