Search for: "UNITED V. PEREZ"
Results 641 - 660
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
IN THE MATTER OF THEESTATE OF ANN GRISCHUK,Deceased.___________________________ Submitted January 11, 2021 – Decided July 27, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:55 am
(See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO review of UDRP disputes - record number of complaints handled by WIPO in 2008 (WIPO) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Class 46) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Goverment outlines new creative industries’ Digital Rights Agency proposed in Digital Britain report (Out-Law) (IP finance) (Intellectual… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Perez, a racial-gerrymandering case from Texas (and a companion case with the same caption). [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
Different Justices’ opinions in Perez v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there assumed and exercised powers unlawful and unjust,… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Finally, Lauren V. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
H (2002) 1 FLR 1008 (United Kingdom -- Family Division -- 2002); see also Robertson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
Cuevas-Perez, 640 F.3d 272 (7th Cir. 2011) (Flaum, J., concurring). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
SIMPSON, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:19 am
United StatesBook People Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
From Rehling v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
In Perez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:56 am
Consider, for example, United States v. [read post]
