Search for: "US v. Coats" Results 641 - 660 of 1,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board also offers us some interesting – and possibly controversial – findings on how to understand certain statements of G 2/98. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:43 pm
The concept was characterised by the fact that a third party attempts to use signs corresponding to trade marks with a reputation, to ride on its coat-tails in order to benefit from its power of attraction, its reputation and its prestige, and to exploit, without paying any financial compensation and without being required to make efforts of its own in that regard, the marketing effort expended by the proprietor of that mark in order to create and maintain the image of that mark. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
If you are a publisher who would like to participate in this feature, please let us know via the site's contact form. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 12:02 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Afterwards we hit a club for a bit where I danced like a lunatic without taking my hat or coat off. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Coats, shows us how the courts look to find the agency relationship between the acts of an agent and an insurance company. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:37 am
Finally, Screentime and Five Divas submitted that SBS and Talpa acted unlawfully by riding on the coat-tails of the reputation of the POPSTARS sign, resulting in damage to Screentime and Five Divas. [read post]