Search for: "United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit"
Results 641 - 660
of 7,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm
The trial court granted NAS’s motion for summary judgment, which decision was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:37 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 5:13 pm
I suspect that everyone interested in federal sentencing jurisprudence will find something they like and something they don't like in two big rulings today from the Third Circuit. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
§ 145, which provides: An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board…may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States District Court….The court may adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a patent… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Thomas I. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:55 pm
In a recent decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (NY, VT, CT) formally joined its sister circuit courts in adopting a standard for determining when a school district has fulfilled its responsibility to educate a student with disabilities in the least restrictive environment (LRE). [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 8:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
Tallman) at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 3:01 pm
And, in the third paragraph of your latest appeal, Judge Beezer describes your status for the reader with the following language:"Gadda has now been disbarred by the State of California, the BIA, the United States District Court for Northern District of California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:54 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 8:13 pm
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the need to put on safety/protective clothing constituted work although no real physical effort was involved. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
United States has been to the U.S. [read post]
WHAT CONSTITUTES “SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE” TO SUPPORT AN SEC FINDING OF A FALSE STATEMENT IN A FORM U-4
31 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
Apr. 6, 2009), the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals considered what constitutes substantial evidence to support a finding by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:49 pm
Right on time for New York’s Fashion Week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled today that “Louboutin’s trademark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman’s shoe” has acquired secondary meaning as a distinctive source-identifier for Louboutin’s luxury brand. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, Case No. 11-1472 On Petition for Review of an Order of the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Nationwide Insurance Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit discussed when an employee’s time working from home counts toward the 1,250 minimum hours required for an employee to be covered by the Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
On June 17, 2011, the Ninth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed a district judge’s decision to exclude Dr David S. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 5321(a)(5) (2004) that currently are before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a pending appeal: (1) whether the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) must establish that a taxpayer had knowledge of the legal duty under federal tax law to report foreign bank accounts, but acted in “reckless disregard” of that duty, before it may impose a civil penalty for a willful violation of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
